Beatles vs. Stones by John McMillian
Beatles vs. Stones
by John McMillian
The
Beatles were considered to be the respectable, clean, lovable boys from the
North of England. Their signature hair was mimicked by up and coming bands and
their hometown of Liverpool started drawing countless talent scouts looking for
the next big thing. But this image of the Beatles was one created over time, in
an effort to get noticed and sign a record deal. The Beatles started off
playing in a cavern to a crowd of loyal fans who liked their rough behavior. In
Hamburg, Germany where they played for countless hours, they had already
started to experiment with drugs and have a lot of sex with groupies in a
rundown room. This was before they started wearing all black and had
choreographed bows. Then there was Beatlemania. Then came the Rolling Stones,
five young men from posh London with a completely different upbringing than
that of the Beatles. In an effort to stand out, the Rolling Stones began to act
out and became known as the anti-Beatles. Outspoken, sometimes rude, unkempt
and lively the Stones would take the stage with their list of rhythm and blues
songs to cover and command the stage. Both groups were extremely successful
setting the stage for what the media would contend to be a great rivalry.
If you are a fan of the Beatles or
the Rolling Stones then let me start off by saying that is probably a book you
are going to enjoy or at the very least find fascinating. McMillian in this
double biography takes an even approach to why these two groups were considered
to be rivals over the span of their careers. He starts at the beginning
explaining where both groups began and how they attained success and very early
on he stresses that the Beatles and Stones respected each other and by many
accounts were friends. The public however saw the stark contrast between the
two groups and the fans, with the help of the media, created the rivalry. Most
people felt a very strong connection to one group or the other and many
couldn’t or wouldn’t support both. Parents and the older generation held
disdain for the Stones, while many of those in the younger generation who loved
the Stones found the Beatles to be conformist. The Beatles and the Rolling
Stones would both attract a lot of media attention and were always aware of the
ongoing debate and the question of who the people preferred.
Talk about getting an introduction
into the history of the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. This book was done in
broad strokes. If you want a detailed history of either group then this isn’t
the book for you. This book examines the two groups in comparison to one
another. How did one group influence the other? How did they handle the
underline pressure and competition? Why did one group break up while the other
continued to play together for decades? Which group was better? All these
questions are up for debate and examined. It’s all complicated because it’s all
subjective. McMillian provided information in context and discussed the
rivalry. This biography is extremely fascinating but at times it felt disjointed.
I am attributing that all to McMillian’s writing style. Topics would be
introduced and glazed over and reintroduced in a way that I found distracting.
But this double biography was worth reading because the culture of the 1960’s
and 1970’s was so fascinating and the two groups were the focus of that. I give
this novel 3.5 out of 5 stars.
Comments
Post a Comment