The Queen of the Damned by Anne Rice (1988)
The Queen of the
Damned by Anne Rice
I love
when I get lost in the pages of a novel. When the narrative is beautiful,
interesting and just whisk me away to whatever time and place the story is
taking place. I absolutely hate it when the story gets muddled half way through
and the story gets lost in an unnecessary lengthy plot that starts to drag the
story out. This in a nutshell is my relationship with The Queen of the Damned. Now, mind you, this isn’t in any way shape
or form a bad novel. I enjoyed this story. I simply lost interest midway through
and dragged myself to the finish line.
Lestat
(yes, that Lestat from Interview With The
Vampire which I absolutely loved) is a rock star. He has an autobiography
out where he admitted to being a vampire and where he also divulged the history
of Akasha and Enkil, the first of the vampires. He claims to have kissed the
frozen statue that Akasha is now and claims to have drank her blood. Well, now
Akasha is awake. Covens are being set on fire and only those close to Lestat
seem to be safe. Then there are the dreams of the twins with red hair that
haunt the vampires as they sleep. The twins from millennia past that are
somehow connected to the awakening of the Queen.
Like I
said, this novel started off beautifully. I was so into the story. The world
building was fantastic. There was so much mystery and so much history. And of
course, there was Lestat. I really enjoyed the first two hundred pages of the
story. Then Rice started going into detail with the twins and we finally meet
the Queen and the story slowed down. To a snail’s pace. I guess I found the
mystery of the twins more interesting that the reality. Or maybe it was the way
in which the history unfolded. Rice’s method of storytelling changed and as it
changed my attention waned. Were the characters interesting? For the most part
yes. Especially all of the characters that we weren’t aware of in previous
novels. Was the world building amazing? Not amazing but good. The major flaw
then had to be the change in narrative half way through. Alas, I have to rate
this 3.5 out of 5. Good but not amazingly great.
Comments
Post a Comment